MCAS was first recognized in 1991 but wasn’t named as a
condition until 2007. This term
encompasses a large, probably prevalent series of illnesses associated with
mast cells that are activated but not proliferating. While the 2008 WHO classification does not
recognize MCAS, it is being recognized more frequently and there have been
several calls for standard diagnostic criteria.
Most MCAS patients have been sick for decades. Some may live their whole lives without
knowing the reason for their illness.
They are generally inexplicably, chronically ill. Their disease often fits no pattern, and
usually laboratory testing for various conditions yields borderline or negative
results. When the results are positive,
they are often not diagnostically significant.
Some patients have severe complications in one system (renal failure,
for example) that cannot be explained.
Sometimes, another known disease is present and is blamed for all
symptoms, even when this makes little sense.
Most patients can identify a specific point at which their
health changed dramatically for the worse.
In hindsight, it usually followed a period of significant physical or
emotional stress. Many patients believe
that this trigger caused the illness. It
is only after a thorough history with review of all systems that many people
realize that their symptoms preceded the event, often going back to childhood.
In MCAS, mast cell burden is generally normal, and symptoms
are due exclusively to inappropriate activation and subsequent mediator
release. It is impossible to match therapy
with symptoms and combinations must be tried until a successful one is
found. Most patients are able to
eventually identify a successful regimen in which they feel much better most of
the time, though periods of flares still persist.
A source of frustration for MCAS patients is the fact that
due to their generally low tryptase values and usually being CKIT-, they are
often dismissed as being negative for mast cell disease. There has been a suggestion in recent years
to consider mast cell activation due an episode as being an elevation in
tryptase of 20% over baseline + 2ng/ml.
Some providers use this formula, but it is unvalidated.
The “CKIT mutation” tested for, and generally considered to
be confirmatory for mast cell disease, is the D816V mutation. However, despite often being negative for
this specific mutation, multiple studies have shown that MCAS patients almost always have multiple
mutations at other locations in the CKIT gene.
These mutations are likely responsible both for the individual
constellation of symptoms, including sensitivities, as well as unique responses
to various treatments. It has been
suggested that in the future, multiple mutations within the CKIT gene will be
confirmatory for mast cell disease, instead of exclusively the D816V mutation.
Though the general school of thought for decades has been
that mast cell disease is both rare and proliferative, in the last few years we
have learned that this is often untrue. Due
to current, ongoing research by several prominent opinion leaders, we are
learning new things about this condition regularly.
No comments:
Post a Comment